The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has set out plans to use "new regulatory initiatives" with over 1,000 schemes as it aims to tighten its regulatory grip and boost member outcomes.
The watchdog will strengthen its scrutiny across the board, with particular attention being paid to deficit repair contributions (DRCs), recovery plan lengths, record-keeping standards, and the timely payment of auto-enrolment (AE) contributions.
In its corporate plan for the next three years, published yesterday (16 May), TPR said it wanted to increase participation in workplace pensions, while boosting savers' confidence in both the security and quality of their retirement products.
The regulator has set itself 18 key performance indicators to measure its progress over the three years, each aligned with six corporate priorities, and four overarching outcomes.
Speaking to PP, chief executive Charles Counsell said the watchdog was working to become involved ahead of major scheme events, where possible.
"We have over the last two years or so striven to become proactive and targeted, and you can really see that through our corporate plan this year," he said. "For instance, our supervision approach which means that more than 1,000 schemes will feel our gentle hand."
This is in addition to around 60 schemes which will face one-to-one supervision, as the watchdog announced last year, with around 20 already subject to this.
"Some of the things that we will be focused on are, for instance, record keeping, and specifically driving those who haven't undertaken a review of their records for the last three years to do so.
"We're also going to be looking at investment governance and driving reviews of the default investment funds."
Counsell reiterated the regulator's focus on driving up the value of DRCs where "those seem to be low relative to dividend payments" as reducing recovery plan lengths "where it's affordable" and "greater than the average for any specific tranche" of schemes.
In its latest quarterly compliance and enforcement bulletin, also published yesterday, TPR outlined a case study of where an employer agreed to suspend dividend payments for six years, reduce its scheme's recovery plan length, and increase annual DRC payments.
Improving standards of record keeping will, in particular, be a priority for TPR over the next few years, especially as the pensions dashboard is rolled out.
"Record keeping is one of those things that is really important and, for me, is all about ensuring that schemes are well-governed and well-administered by their trustees," Counsell continued.
"It is a fact that not all schemes have good record keeping and good data in practice, to be honest, particularly where they may be smaller schemes. We do encourage them to think about whether or not they should be moving that scheme into something that is bigger and has more scale, but we're very conscious of the associated costs of all these things.
"Record keeping is particularly important as we move towards having in place the pensions dashboard, which is such an important thing for individuals. Therefore, there's a lot of work to be done over the next two years with trustees."
Linked to this, there is an enhanced focus on administration standards. While the regulator does believe the administration market "is dominated by a small number of providers", there is still a "reasonable market".
Counsell said it was important that "good levels of quality" were being provided for a "value for money price". The regulator has plans to publish more guidance in this area, alongside a "closer supervisory regime" in the "absence of a formal regulatory regime".
All of this will come with a boosted workforce and budget, with the regulator setting out plans to increase its number of staff members by 17% by 2021/22, rising from 660 to 774, while the budget will rise by 24% in the same period compared to last year's actual spend.
Counsell said the increased costs were necessary as the regulator's net widens to include a wider range of provision and regulatory activities, including defined benefit (DB) superfunds and defined contribution (DC) master trust supervision.
In addition, the watchdog has the ongoing monitoring of re-enrolment under AE, which causes peaks and troughs in the overall budget needed.
The distribution of the regulator's resources among its various teams will remain largely the same over 2019/20 compared to 2018/19, with around 33% allocated to frontline regulation and 17% to regulatory policy. There will be a marginal two percentage point reduction in direct AE, recognising that staging has now concluded.
The corporate plan comes after the Department for Work and Pensions yesterday also published a regular review of the watchdog, outlining 16 recommendations to improve its effectiveness.
The report noted the "significant impact on the development and performance of the organisation" during the tenure of Lesley Titcomb, who stepped down as chief executive in March.
Counsell said he would continue Titcomb's "transformation of TPR over the last couple of years".
"As you'll see from the plan, I'm absolutely committed to completing that transformation," he said. "So that we are not only seen as, but we really truly are, clearer, quicker and tougher in the way we do things."
TPR's key corporate priorities
The regulator has set itself 18 key performance indicators to measure its progress over the next three years, each aligned with one of its six corporate priorities.
Extending its regulatory reach with a wider range of proactive and targeted regulatory interventions
- It will authorise all eligible master trusts within the statutory timescales
- It will undertake supervision of the most strategically important schemes
- It implement five new regulatory initiatives based on its core regulatory risk assessment
Providing clarity, promoting and enforcing against the high standards of trusteeship, governance and administration it expects
- Schemes have provided their scheme returns to TPR in line with requirements
- It will establish a content strategy and framework for all its publications
- It will support development of and design its approach to deliver the required data standards for the pensions dashboards
Intervening where necessary so that schemes are properly funded to meet their liabilities as they fall due
- It will increase the number of DB case outcomes using its powers
- It will increase the deficit repair contributions in DB schemes
- It will reduce the length of recovery plans
Ensuring staff have an opportunity to save into a qualifying workplace pension
- Employers have a qualifying scheme for automatic enrolment in place
- Staff have been put in a qualifying scheme
- Employer make accurate and timely contributions to their schemes on behalf of their workforce
Enabling workplace pensions schemes to deliver their benefits through significant change, including responding to Brexit
- It will publish its annual funding statement and other forms of guidance as necessary to outline its expectations
- There are a reduced number of schemes in the pensions landscape
Building a regulator capable of meeting the future challenges it faces
- It has high employee engagement
- It has implemented the new operating model resulting from TPR Future
- It will commence the design and implementation of new systems to support its regulatory functions
If authorities really want to stop scams, they ought to make it safe for trustees to refuse a transfer that shows red flags, says Margaret Snowdon
While the Pension Schemes Bill is continuing its route through the parliamentary process, there are still some loose ends to tie up - including section 107. Here, Richard Butcher, looks at what the implications of that clause could mean for DB schemes....
Superfunds will be a “useful weapon” for defined benefit schemes moving forward, with their need solidified after the economic struggles caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Guy Opperman has said.
Schemes trying to delay the dashboard project by not collecting the necessary data will be left behind, Guy Opperman has warned.
The industry has raised serious concerns that Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) transfer advice proposals on illustrative figures could hamper schemes’ ability to help members to understand their retirement options and force many to take full regulated...