McClymont: The power of AE inertia is not too powerful
Gregg McClymont says AE schemes make it easy to opt-out should members feel contributions are not in their best interest
Research by the Institute of Fiscal Studies' (IFS) shows that nine out of ten eligible people are saving into a pension as a result of automatic enrolment.
But the IFS study also shows that a small minority, some 3% of savers, are worryingly financially vulnerable. This small group is likely to be better off stopping saving in a pension, in order to receive a higher income during this period of immense uncertainty.
The opt-out mechanism built into auto-enrolment enables this. The question is whether important financial decisions are not being made by members of this small group because of inertia. That is, is the power of inertia too powerful?
The behavioural economics debate has come a long way in that sense. Before 2012, policymakers weren't sure whether automatic enrolment would really raise savings rates - opt out rates were expected to be much higher than we have seen.
DWP-commissioned social research in the run-up to auto-enrolment's (AE's) launch eight years ago showed that people were much more likely to accept AE if they had a feeling of control. If the ability to opt out were hidden from them, then they were much more likely to become angry, revolt and opt out. It was important, therefore, that opt out was obvious and easy.
And it is. The two biggest providers of AE pensions in the UK, The People's Pension and Nest, make it easy and it can be done online or over the phone. For example, you do not have to set up your online account with The People's Pension in order to opt out over the web. After eight years of AE, policymakers and pension funds have data to mine which provides important context for the IFS findings.
Experience of AE in real time has also offered evidence about how inertia actually works. Policymakers knew the research into 401k schemes in the US showed that changing the savings decision from opt out to opt in massively increased the number of people saving for retirement. But the thought processes and patterns of behaviour which underpinned inertia were not so clear.
One explanation offered in theory was that people simply not know that they had been automatically enrolled. The experience of AE suggests otherwise. Right now, we think that only about 15% of those automatically enrolled do not know that they are saving into a workplace pension. The vast majority of those saving are aware and are presumably happy about it or they would stop. This means that lack of awareness is an increasingly weak argument for why AE works as well as it does at scale.
The second potential explanation for the power of inertia in the pensions' context is that, people want to save for retirement and will do so, provided it's done largely on their behalf and with strong financial incentives, through tax relief and the employer contribution. AE appears to work because it aligns the long-term savings decision with what people feel they should do but struggled to do in practice.
The final explanation offered by some is that, because of inertia, people just don't get around to opting out or ceasing contributions. That remains possible but less likely as the largest providers have deliberately made opt outing out easy. Although the modest sums involved in AE statutory minimum contributions for the lowest paid might also be a factor.
In short, the AE system is designed to make stopping saving simple, and to make restarting pension saving through auto-enrolment easy too, via the re-enrolment process. As such, auto-enrolment's design enables it to respond flexibly to the financial pressures on members that the Covid-19 crisis is bringing in its wake.
Gregg McClymont is director of policy at The People's Pension
More on Defined Contribution
A climate for engagement
Newton Investment Management's Lloyd McAllister looks at how an active approach could help DC schemes to tackle climate change
Covid-19 likely to push DC schemes into master trusts
The economic uncertainty generated by Covid-19 is likely to cause a large number of defined contribution (DC) schemes to move into master trusts, according to PP readers.
Schemes on the hunt to maximise GMP conversion benefits
Red tape preventing pension schemes from managing the barriers around GMP equalisation is leading to many combining conversion with pension increase exercises (PIE), Aon says.
FCA launches workplace pensions value for money consultation
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will bring forward proposals designed to promote value for money for workplace pension schemes members, a consultation paper says.
Floodgates open for DC scheme shift to master trusts as asset commitments top £4bn during lockdown
There will be a “surge” of employers moving defined contribution (DC) occupational trust pension schemes to master trusts as lockdown eases and employees return to work post-furlough, Hymans Robertson says.
Most read
