UK - Unilever's claim against Merrill Lynch Investment Management (MLIM) will hinge on the wording of the contract between the two parties, the judge presiding over the case indicated in the High Court today.
Mr Justice Colman drew attention to clause 6.1 in the contract and said the question of whether it was an enforceable provision would be key. The clause refers to the target return of 1% asked of ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today
In just a few clicks you can start your free Professional Pensions Lite membership for 12 months, providing you access to:
- Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
Are you a trustee, investment consultant or in-house pension and benefit scheme professional? You can apply for full complimentary access here
