UK - Unilever barrister Jonathan Sumption QC yesterday attempted in the High Court to prove that one of the key points of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers' (MLIM) defence was flawed.
He said that part of MLIM’s case rests on proving that monitoring total fund active risk – the likelihood of investment underperformance based on historical models – rather than UK equity active ri...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today
In just a few clicks you can start your free Professional Pensions Lite membership for 12 months, providing you access to:
- Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders
Are you a trustee, investment consultant or in-house pension and benefit scheme professional? You can apply for full complimentary access here
